서머빌 보우라인

서머빌-보우라인-13

제가 가장 좋아하는 포워드 텐션 싱글 컬럼 타이입니다. 후미 끝이 이미 무언가에 부착되어 있을 때 사용할 수 있습니다! 꼬리를 당길 필요가 없습니다.

이 놀랍도록 유용한 넥타이는 캐릭 벤드의 변형으로 프렌치 보우라인의 요소도 포함하고 있습니다. 이 넥타이는 다음과 같은 사람들에 의해 발견되어 BDSM 커뮤니티에 소개되었습니다. 토폴로지스트 2009년에 설립되어 일본 출신이 아닌 가장 널리 알려진 인연 중 하나가 되었습니다.

장점: 밧줄의 다른 쪽 끝이 이미 무언가에 묶여 있을 때 무언가를 묶는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 양쪽 끝에서 풀 수도 있습니다. 즉, 이 매듭은 장력 하에서 매우 안정적이므로 장력 하에서 풀어야 할 필요가 있을 것으로 예상되는 경우(예 고테 시바리), 바이트가 자유롭게 당겨질 수 있도록 '슬립'해야 합니다.

단점:  일부 옵션보다 조금 더 부피가 크지만 이는 매우 사소한 문제입니다...

밧줄 코일

이 데모에서는 제휴사인 Twisted Monk에서 제공한 10'(~3m) 길이의 천연 6mm 조각 하나를 사용했습니다.

놀라운 품질의 마 로프를 구경하세요!

더공국 지원

다음은 서머빌 보우라인이 어떻게 구조화되는지 간단하게 보여주는 그림입니다. 각 단계에 대한 자세한 설명과 함께 이를 묶는 방법에 대한 절차적인 버전을 보려면 아래의 '상세' 버전을 확인하세요.

무엇이든 단일 열을 만들 수 있습니다. 이 경우에는 손목을 선택하겠습니다. 묶는 기둥과 수직이 될 때이 넥타이를 배우는 것이 더 쉽습니다. 연습하면 단 몇 초 만에 묶을 수 있습니다!

이 예시에서는 두 가닥(총 4가닥)을 감아 넥타이를 묶었지만, 세 가닥(총 6가닥)을 감아 더 넓은 영역에 힘을 분산시킬 수도 있습니다. 여분의 랩을 사용하면 박스 타이처럼 하나의 기둥에 두 손목을 끼울 때 특히 유용합니다.

서머빌 보우라인을 빠르게 풀 수 있는 멋진 비법이 있습니다!

때로는 불편하거나 마비된 경우 매우 빠르게 풀 수 있도록 단일 기둥을 묶는 것이 도움이 될 수 있습니다. 이때 서머빌 보라인의 슬립 버전이 특히 박스 타이에 매우 유용할 수 있습니다. 손목을 빠르게 풀면 아래쪽이 팔 전체를 곧게 펴고 돌릴 수 있어 대부분의 경우 압박 문제를 즉시 완화할 수 있습니다.

미끄러진 서머빌 보우라인은 몇 초 만에 풀 수 있습니다!

이 게시물 공유하기

17 댓글

  1. HI! I wonder both with this and with the fast bowline if tension can be put on the bight end (the one I wrap around all the cords) as well – or should I keep tension to only the tail end (the one I loop around the bight end)? Thank you!

    1. You can with this the Somerville Bowline and Burlington Bowline, yes, but I haven’t explored the fast/eskimo bowline nearly as much. Looking at the structure again just now, I can’t see a reason that you could not. Give it a try under controlled conditions and see how it performs. If you do, let us know how it goes!

  2. Very very cool to add a quick way to undo a Somerville bowline

  3. Hi! A couple of questions. I notice that there never really is any rope going through the initial “bight” you make, so would you be able to make this tie using the tail end of a rope?

    Seconds question derives from the first I guess because can you make this from the tail of some other tie or harness?

    I’m trying to think of what applications all these ties are applicable to.

    1. Yes! That is one of the cool features of forward-tension single columns: you can tie them (and untie them) without having to release the tail. One implication of this is that you can use them in an “in-line” capacity. Another is that you can tie them at the tail end of you rope as well! This tie and the Burlington Bowline are both great ties for any such application. These can be useful for Bondage Belts or inline cuffs on other harnesses, etc. I also like the slipped version of this as the starting point for box ties as the knot is bombproof, but the slipped version can still be quickly removed by the top if needed in an emergency.

  4. Hi, there seems to be a lot of similarities between this and the Burlington bowling, are there any specific situations which require one or the other or are they interchangeable?

    1. Yes, they are very similar. This one was invented first, but the Burlington Bowline has some features from some the bola-bola as well. You can use them pretty much interchangeably.

  5. Hi Lazarus,
    In your ‘TK’ tutorials you mention doing this with a “slip” but I haven’t found an example of what you mean by that and this step by step looks the same as the video for the ‘TK’. If this is the ‘slipped’ version then awesome, if not then I’d love an example either here or part of the ‘TK’ tutorial. Thank you so much for everything on this site, it is my main source of education as I make my way into this wonderful world.

    1. Good point! I do need to add that to the SB tutorial. I will get it on the list!

  6. I don’t want to step into any controversies (not even sure if one exists), but the book “Essence of Shibari” by Shin Nawakari notes the following when covering this tie:

    “In 2010, the American bakushi Topologist modified the Portuguese-style bowline and the French-style bowline to explain the tie in this section. It became named the Somerville bowline. Later, Wykd Dave and others discovered that the knot was in fact the Carrick bend, which has existed for a long time. Therefore, this book uses the original name.”

    I’m not suggesting that you ignore or diminish Topologist’s role in this great tie, but it might be worth changing the title to “Somerville Bowline (Carrick Bend)” and the intro to something like Topologist “discovered and introduced its use in rope bondage” instead of “invented” to be more accurate (assuming that Nawakari’s explanation is correct).

    1. You raise a great point Bob! I hadn’t thought to include that history in the post, but thank you for adding it. And good suggestions for an update to the description!

    2. Theres some misunderstanding of knot terminology happening here on the part of Nawakari. A bend is a knot for joining two lengths of rope. A bowline is a knot for making stable loops. Two knots with the same pattern of turns can have different names for different purposes. If it connects two ropes its a bend. If it makes a loop its a bowline. For instance the sheet bend and the traditional bowline are in fact the same knot. One is a connector knot the other is a loop knot.

  7. Is it possible or how would one take the tail and combine it into a single stitch chain column for the model to have something more substantial to hold onto

    1. Well, one of the benefits of this tie is that you can untie it without having to untie the tail first (cool safety feature). If you added a hand hold as you describe, you would lose that feature. If you want to have a hand hold, I would use the technique shown in the “Flogging Cuff” tutorial, or, if you want the chain stitch, start with a Lark’s Head Single Column and then just add a chain stitch to the tail before anchoring it. Best of luck with your experiments!! –LR

  8. Pingback에서: 그래비티 부트 싱글 컬럼 - TheDuchy

  9. Pingback에서: 해피 스트랩 본디지 벨트 - TheDuchy

  10. Pingback에서: 속박 벨트 - TheDuchy

댓글 남기기 댓글